IF YOU CANNOT READ THIS EMAIL PLEASE CLICK HERE

NEWSLETTER FAMILY LAW
MAY 2007

MAIN PAGE DE  FACTO  LAWS SHARED PARENTING MEET OUR TEAM


CHANGES TO PARENTING PROVISIONS OF THE FAMILY LAW ACT:
IMPACT ON ENROLMENT OF CHILDREN
JANETA NEDANOVSKA, SOLICITOR

On 1 July 2006 the Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act 2006 (“the Act”) came into effect, reforming the existing Family Law Act 1975.

The Act has introduced a presumption of “equal shared parental responsibility”.  This means that both parents have an equal role in making decisions about “major long term issues”.  That is, the decision must be made jointly.   

The definition of major long term issues includes decisions about the child’s education (both current and future), the child’s religious and cultural upbringing, the child’s health, the child’s name, and significant changes to the child’s living arrangements. 

Where the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility applies, the Court must then consider whether it is in the child’s best interest to spend equal time with their parents. The court may decide that equal time with each parent is not in the child’s best interest and make orders providing for child to spend “substantial and significant time” with the other parent. In either case, both parents are expected to genuinely consult with each other and be actively involved in major long term decision making.  

The presumption of equal shared parental responsibility will not apply if there are reasonable grounds to believe that abuse or family violence has occurred.

HOW SHARED PARENTING AFFECTS SCHOOL ENROLMENTS

Schools are commonly faced with a dilemma where separated or divorced parents are in dispute about the enrolment of their child.

The ideal situation would be for both parents to agree and cooperate regarding the school their child is to attend, but sometimes (for example in cases involving cultural or religious differences between the parents) agreement is simply not possible.

ADVICE FOR SCHOOL 

Decisions about a child’s education are often extremely important to parents, including separated parents.  It is not surprising that the issue often creates conflict and that, in some cases, this difference of opinion cannot be resolved by the child’s parents.  

It is prudent for schools to identify whether the enrolment is agreed and advisable to avoid ‘taking sides’.  This is not always easy; a parent may exert pressure on the school to accept an enrolment (notwithstanding parental conflict) in order to secure a place for the child where this is limited availability.

We suggest that schools should always ask whether there is a Parenting Order or Parenting Plan in place. If so, they should request a copy for their records.  The Order or Plan will (1) identify whether the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility applies and (2) if the issue of education has already been litigated, will either specify a school(s) for the child or specify who will make the final decision about enrolment. 

What is the difference between a parenting plan and a parenting order?

·                          Parenting Plan: an agreement between the parents of a child that is in writing, is signed by both parents, is dated and deals with matters relating to the child. It does not need to be witnessed by an independent person and is not filed/registered with the Family Court.

·                          Parenting Order:  an order made by either the Family Court or Federal Magistrates’ Court which deals with matters relating to the child and bears the Court Seal, is dated and described as either interim or final orders.

What if there is no plan or order in place?

There will be cases where there is no parenting plan or a court order. The presumption of equal shared parenting applies but can be displaced.  One parent is able to enrol the child into school independently of the other parent. In other words, there is no legislative or formal requirement that a parent first prove that a long-term decision has been made jointly before acting.  However, if there is reason to believe that there has been no consultation with the other parent or there is a dispute, it may be prudent to request that:

(a)              both parents sign the enrolment form; and

(b)              both parties enter into a parenting plan and provide the school with a signed and dated copy.

What if there is a parenting plan and a court order and they are conflicting?

If the court orders were made after the dated of the parenting plan, the court orders prevail. On the other hand, if the parenting plan was made subsequent to the court orders, they will prevail unless, the court order specifically states that the court order may only be varied by a subsequent court order.

If after examining both the parenting plan and court orders, the school is still unable to ascertain which parent has the right to enrol the child into their school, legal advice should be obtained.

ADVICE FOR PARENTS

Shared parental responsibility does not mean you must consult the other parent about all decisions; decisions other than major long term decisions may be made by the person with whom the child is spending time without the need for consultation.  These are commonly referred to as “day to day issues”.

As stated above, a child’s education is definitely an issue which requires genuine consultation and joint decision making.

What is meant by genuine consultation?

The process of consultation should involve setting out your proposal in relation to schooling for consideration by the other (i.e. which school, where and why), providing relevant information to assist the other parent to make a decision (e.g. the school information pack) and allow a reasonable time for the other parent to respond. 

Consultation can be assisted by a Family Dispute Resolution Practitioner if direct communication is difficult.

What if agreement cannot be reached?

If agreement cannot be reached, then (effective 1 July 2007) you will need to attend upon a Family Dispute Resolution Practitioner (FDR) in order to obtain a certificate (certifying that you have attempted to resolve the matter out of Court). 

In the event that you resolve the matter at FDR, a parenting plan or Court Order should be drawn up to document the agreement reached.

Alternatively, you may need to commence proceedings in the Family Court or Federal Magistrates’ Court seeking determination of the outstanding issue(s).  The Courts now use a less adversarial means of determining parenting disputes, however, expert legal advice is strongly recommended. 

Ultimately, the Court will decide the matter on the basis of the child’s best interests; this is the paramount consideration in any parenting case before the Court.  The Court may elect a 3rd option (i.e. neither the father nor the mother’s proposal). 

Jodylee Bartal and Janeta Nedanovska can provide further information or specific advice on this topic.  They can be contacted on +61 4 9609 1552 or by email at jbartal@rk.com.au or jnedanovska@rk.com.au


CLICK HERE TO VIEW OUR OTHER NEWS ARTICLES

LEASING FAMILY LAW AGED CARE TECHNOLOGY LAW WILLS & ESTATES
BANKING & FINANCE SPORTS LAW EMPLOYMENT PROPERTY GOVT & PLANNING


LEVEL 12, 469 LA TROBE STREET MELBOURNE VIC 3000.    PO BOX 5146AA MELBOURNE VIC 3001
T: +61 3 96091555 F: +61 3 96091600 E: INFO@RK.COM.AU W: WWW.RK.COM.AU
SUBSCRIBE  |  UNSUBSCRIBE


Copyright 2007 © Russell Kennedy.
The information contained in this publication is intended as general commentary and should not be regarded as legal advice. Should you require specific advice on any of the topics or areas discussed, please contact the author directly.