Phone: 61 3 9609 1555
Fax: 61 3 9609 1600
Email:
info@rk.com.au
Web:
www.rk.com.au
subscribe | unsubscribe


TECHNOLOGY LAW NEWSLETTER
ECOMMERCE | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY | PRIVACY | TELECOMMUNICATIONS

FEBRUARY 2007


CRAIG SUBOCZ
Solicitor


Craig has several years experience advising clients in the areas of intellectual property, information technology, trade practices, commercial and corporate law. Craig has advised clients on trade mark registration and licensing, trade mark enforcement, domain name registrations and disputes, and copyright protection for technology products.

He has also advised clients on website agreements, software licensing and maintenance agreements, consultancy and services agreements, incorporated and unincorporated joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, equity swaps and supply agreements.

Main PageColour Me Branded Domain Names Do Not Call Register iPod Uploads Privacy Gone Mad Moral Rights Test

Can i upload this to my ipod?
Craig Subocz, Solicitor

Have you recently taped a TV show or uploaded a song to an iPod?  Well, relax (but be careful), because you (probably) no longer infringe copyright.

The Commonwealth Government, recognising that these are common activities, reformed Australia’s copyright law on 1 January 2007 to bring it into line with consumer behaviour.  However, the ‘devil is in the detail’.

Previously

Before 1 January 2007, Australia’s copyright law prohibited anybody who does not own copyright in a musical work, sound recording or television broadcast from reproducing the work, however a narrow exception may sometimes apply.  Personal copying (taping a TV show or uploading songs to your iPod) was not exempted. 

What the amendments intend to achieve

As part of a wide-ranging review of Australia’s copyright legislation, the Commonwealth Government introduced exceptions that allow a person to record a television program or upload a song from a CD to an iPod without breaching copyright.  Other amendments include amendments regarding technology protection measures, criminal sanctions for ‘piracy’, exceptions for parody and satire, and exceptions for cultural and educational institutions.

The fine print

Recording broadcasts of films and sound recordings (‘time-shifting’)

Under the reforms, recording a broadcast of films or sound recordings solely for private and domestic use by watching or listening to the broadcast at a time more convenient than the broadcast time will not infringe copyright.

The exception does not apply when the article embodying the film or recording is sold, let for hire, by way of trade offered or exposed for sale or hire (advertised), distributed for the purpose of trade or otherwise, used for causing the film or recording to be seen or heard in public, or used for broadcasting the film or recording.

However, simply lending the article embodying the film or recording to another member of the lender’s family or household for that person’s private and domestic use does not cancel the application of the exception to copyright infringement under the amended Copyright Act 1968 (Cth).

The Government considers that dropping the limitation originally included in the exception that the recording had to be carried out on ‘domestic premises’ provides greater flexibility and allows greater use by consumers of developments in digital technologies to record broadcasts outside their homes as well as inside for private and domestic use. 

Now, the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) defines ‘private and domestic use’ to be ‘private and domestic use on or off domestic premises’, in a clear attempt to capture uses such as listening to sound recordings while travelling.

Copying works, sound recordings and films in different format for private use (‘space-shifting’)

These are the so-called ‘iPod’ amendments.  There are some interesting points:

  • The Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) specifies permitted format changes, namely, from books to any other format, photographs stored electronically to hard copy, sound recordings from CDs, tapes, records, digital downloads to any other format (but not podcasts), or films from video into electronic format. 
  • You must own the copy that is ‘space-shifted’ (‘earlier copy’).  The exception does not apply where the copy is borrowed or (understandably) pirated. 
  • The transformed copy (‘later copy’) must be made using the ‘earlier copy’.
  • The sole purpose of the transformation is for your ‘private and domestic use of the later copy’ with a device you own and which can be used to cause sound recordings to be heard. 
  • The space-shifted copy cannot be sold, let for hire, offered or exposed for sale, or distributed for the purpose of trade or otherwise.

Again, the exception to copyright infringement does not apply if either the earlier copy or the later copy is sold, let for hire, by way of trade offered or exposed for sale or hire (advertised), distributed for the purpose of trade or otherwise, used for causing the sound recording to be heard in public, or used for broadcast of the sound recording. 

However, merely lending the earlier copy or later copy to another member in the lender’s family or household for that person’s ‘private and domestic use’ does not cancel the application of the exception to copyright infringement.

The definition of ‘private and domestic use’ applies to the space-shifting exception.

Conclusion

The Commonwealth Government’s amendments to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) in relation to “time-shifting” and “space-shifting” for “personal and domestic use”, by and large, bring copyright law into line with community expectations.  However, the Commonwealth Government chose not to define “personal and domestic use” beyond the clarification that such use is not confined to "domestic premises", so we await with interest further detail from the Courts on this point.

For further information, please contact Craig on +61 3 9609 1646 or email csubocz@rk.com.au

TOP OF PAGE


Click here to view other News Briefs

Commercial Leasing Employment Family Law Health & Aged Care Technology Law


Copyright 2007 © Russell Kennedy.
The information contained in this publication is intended as general commentary and should not be regarded as legal advice. Should you require specific advice on any of the topics or areas discussed, please contact the author directly.